Employment in the UK’s creative industries outside of South East England would have to grow five-fold over the next 20 years to match the economic clout of London’s creative sector, according to a new report.
Research by the Creative Industries Policy & Evidence Centre (PEC) also found that productivity in the creative industries – defined as economic output per worker – is 80% higher in South East England than in the rest of the UK. The report says that “labour productivity would have to grow by about three percentage points more in the rest of the UK for 20 years for these regions to catch up with productivity in the South East, let alone London”, where productivity outstrips other regions by 150%.
The author, University of Manchester Professor and PEC Research Director Bruce Tether, said the findings present “a very substantial challenge” to the Government’s goal of narrowing the gap in creative business activity between the South East and elsewhere in the UK.
“To be honest, maintaining the gap would probably be more achievable than closing the gap,” he told ArtsProfessional.
“Without significant intervention, I would bet my house on London and the South East continuing to pull away from the rest of the country.”
The north-south divide
Tether’s analysis of DCMS data on employment in the creative industries and the gross value added per worker found that regional inequalities are increasing, rather than decreasing as the Government intends.
“If you think that one of the Government’s concerns is with the growing north-south divide, then it’s a concern that the creative industries are growing very healthily in the South East of the country but doing less well in the North and North West,” Tether said.
Between 2010 and 2018, employment in the creative industries grew fastest “perhaps surprisingly … in the North East of England, albeit from a small base” of 31,000 to 46,400 workers (up by 49.6%), the report says. Employment in London grew second-fastest, increasing by 39.8%, over this period.
Northern Ireland experienced far lower growth in employment than other regions – 1.6% over seven years – and was the only region where the creative industries have a declining share of the overall workforce.
The analysis found there was even greater regional disparity in productivity than employment. “There are much greater inequalities in economic output by region than in employment by region,” the report says.
In the report, Tether questions whether the Government’s emphasis on regional ‘clusters’ can ameliorate the divide. “Clusters policies are welcome … but if we think about clusters as an engine for economic growth, my question, my doubt, is whether this engine is up to the task.”
DCMS did not respond directly to the report’s analysis of the feasibility of its policies, but noted several multimillion-pound initiatives under way to develop the creative economy.
Capturing value
Tether said there should be further research into why economic output is so much higher in the south east, even after employment is accounted for.
‘IT, software and computer services’ was included as a creative sub-sector in the PEC’s research, accounting for one-third of all creative industries’ employment last year and 40% of gross value added to the sector in 2017.
Productivity in London’s creative industries has grown much more rapidly than in the rest of the UK, at 2.7% per year compared to 0.4%, calculations based on DCMS data from 2011 to 2017 show.
While productivity grew in all sub-sectors in London except ‘crafts’ and all South East sub-sectors except ‘museums, galleries and libraries’, four out of eight sub-sectors showed declining productivity across the rest of the UK.
Tether’s report suggests an “agglomeration” effect partially explains the higher productivity of areas with larger creative workforces: “The greatest agglomeration is in London, where the costs of doing business are higher, due to higher salaries, office rents, etc. This also means that, other things being equal, firms need to be more productive to survive in London than elsewhere.
“Achieving value is ultimately created to capturing value rather than necessarily creating value.”
